With the rise of health data aggregators released by big tech companies such as Google and Apple, developers have new ways to bring user health data into their digital health solutions. Health Connect, which centralizes health data on Android devices, is similar in intent to Apple Health on iOS but comes with unique limitations. While these aggregators offer valuable data access and facilitate in-house integrations, a unified health data platform such as Thryve provides essential benefits for organizations seeking reliability, scalability, and comprehensive data.
For digital health providers, relying on aggregators like Apple Health, Health Connect or Huawei Health comes with a set of challenges. First and foremost, there is no overarching integrator for all operating systems, so either way, engineers have to integrate, maintain, and unify three or more providers. On top, there are several inherent issues in the nature of the aggregators:
1. Usability
HealthConnect specifically is built into the operating system. Users often have a hard time with the configuration and maintenance of the connections and priorities of data sources connected through HealthConnect, leading to faulty or incomplete data being provided.
2. Data Consistency and Reliability
Aggregators often struggle with data consistency, as they rely on third-party apps to accurately upload and maintain data. This reliance limits reliability: data annotations, specific device information, and certain data types, like ECG, are often not consistently available. What’s worse, apps like S Health may deliberately add their own annotations to data received from connected health trackers without highlighting them accordingly, profoundly impacting downstream utilization of the data processed. Without these data points, clinical and telemedicine applications may lack the necessary insights to deliver high-quality care.
3. Fragmentation and Device Limitations
Health Connect is primarily designed for recent Android versions, which means many devices on older operating systems don’t support its full functionality. Additionally, manufacturers must maintain separate integrations with aggregators, which delays updates and data accuracy for certain sensors. This fragmentation introduces data gaps and inconsistencies across different devices, limiting the completeness of insights.
4. Limited Data Access and Control
Health Connect and similar aggregators prioritize their own data structure, limiting customization and advanced data analytics. Thryve’s API, by contrast, provides a harmonized data model that ensures easy adaptation to complex health use cases, such as clinical research or insurer wellness programs. Thryve’s API supports more granular control over data, helping organizations meet specific requirements in a way that aggregators can’t.
Health Connect and similar aggregators can be valuable tools for some applications, but they’re best viewed as complementary to a more comprehensive platform like Thryve. By integrating with Thryve, you gain the flexibility to access enriched data from multiple sources without the limitations and inconsistencies of aggregators.
As a unified health data platform, Thryve simplifies the integration process, ensuring greater control, security, and scalability for digital health services. Here’s how Thryve stands out:
Relying solely on data aggregators presents significant challenges for any digital health solution aiming to provide high-quality, reliable insights. Thryve offers a unified, secure, and compliant alternative that meets the rigorous demands of health, research, and wellness organizations. By choosing Thryve, you’ll benefit from a robust and flexible solution that goes beyond the basics to empower your application with data that truly enhances health outcomes.
Ready to see how Thryve can elevate your health integration? Book a demo with us today to explore the possibilities